Contact us

Thank you for your interest in Garg Law PLLC.

Our commitment to understanding your regulatory questions and business goals, and helping you achieve results starts here.

If you are looking for representation on a new matter, please fill out the form below to request a free consultation. The form enables us to conduct a preliminary check for potential conflicts of interest and to determine if we can proceed with the free consultation.

USDA-FDA Seek Information About Food Date Labeling, Aim is to Provide Further Clarity, Transparency, and Cost Savings for U.S. Consumers

Food Date Labeling

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today are announcing a joint Request for Information (RFI) about food date labeling, which includes the use of terms such as ‘Sell By,’ ‘Use By,’ and ‘Best By’. The RFI seeks information on industry practices and preferences for date labeling, research results on consumer perceptions of date labeling, and any impact date labeling may have on food waste and grocery costs. For example, questions in the RFI include which products contain date labels and the criteria to decide what phrase to use and what date to include. The RFI also asks questions about how consumers interpret date label information, including whether consumers are confused by this information – especially if they believe the dates determine whether food is safe when in fact, they indicate quality – or whether it has impacts on decisions made while grocery shopping or discarding food. Finally, there are questions that explore any relationship between date labels, food waste, and household expenses.

The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and the FDA jointly have broad jurisdiction and oversight over the U.S. food supply. They have responsibility for ensuring that food labels on products over which they each have jurisdiction are truthful and not misleading. The information collected from the RFI may be used to inform future policy decisions, guidance or consumer education campaigns on food date labels that are intended to help reduce the premature discard of wholesome and safe food.   

“It has been estimated that confusion over the multitude of different date labeling terms on food products accounts for about 20% of food waste in the home. The information collected will help us understand consumers’ perception of terms like ‘Sell By,’ ‘Use By’ and ‘Best By,’” said FDA Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods Jim Jones. “We are looking forward to gathering valuable information to determine how date labeling can make it easier for consumers to know whether a food is still good to eat and avoid food waste. The FDA is committed to doing all that we can to support informed and sound decisions that are good for U.S. consumers.”

“Food labels contain a wealth of information for consumers, including a food product’s ‘best if used by’ date,” said USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Emilio Esteban. “Through this Request for Information, we hope to learn more about how those date labels are determined and whether they confuse consumers and lead to needless food waste.” 

The action today is one of many actions to be taken in response to the National Strategy for Reducing Food Loss and Waste and Recycling Organics, which was released by the FDA, USDA, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in June 2024. The USDA estimates that the average family of four spends at least \$1,500 each year on food that ends up uneaten, and the EPA estimates that, in 2019, 66 million tons of wasted food was generated in the food retail, food service, and residential sectors, and most of this waste (about 60%) was sent to landfills. The National Strategy lays out a path that would enable the U.S. to meet its national goal of reducing food loss and waste by 50% by 2030, to help reduce the environmental impacts of food waste and lower costs for American families.

In response to the draft National Strategy for Reducing Food Loss and Waste and Recycling Organics, the FDA and the USDA received over 9,800 comments encouraging an update of the federal date labeling requirements, including standardizing date labeling. Commenters noted that food manufacturers use a variety of phrases such as “Sell By,” “Use By” and “Best By” on product labels to describe dates on a voluntary basis. According to commenters, the use of different phrases to describe dates may cause consumer confusion and lead to the premature disposal of wholesome and safe food because it is past the date printed on the package. The RFI attempts to explore the issues raised in those comments by asking stakeholders for information they have relevant to this topic. 

Both the FDA and USDA currently recommend that food industry members voluntarily apply the “Best if Used By” quality-based food date label, which notes the date after which quality may decline but the product may still be consumed. Although the FDA and USDA encourage the use of the phrase “Best if Used By,” current federal regulations do not prohibit industry from using other date labeling phrases, such as “Sell By” or “Use By,” if they are truthful and not misleading. 

Commenters will have 60 days to provide comments responsive to one or more of the 13 questions posed. Further information on how to submit a comment can be found here.

Request a Consultation

★★★★★

Working with Shelly on various new product launches over the last couple of years has been seamless. Quick and clear guidance is always what we get.
R.G. Client
I've been working with Shelly and her team at Garg law for a little while now and they are fantastic! Very responsive, professional and they certainly get things done. Extremely satisfied with their service and highly recommend.
Mike H. Client
Ms Garg helped my company navigate an FDA import issue. She achieved an excellent result, was very responsive and professional, and managed to keep the project within budget. She is a stellar attorney.
Dr. Sastry Client
I have been using Shelly Garg as FDA Counsel for 10+ years, since she was at another international law firm. While we continued to use the previous firm she was at (mainly due to the process required to change firms), we realized the quality of counsel was not the same. We have since been using Garg Law and the ease of use and trust in the knowledge was back instantly. Shelly has the skills to help me understand the regulations (by translating into layman's terms) and risks in a manner that is specific to my business. She is also extremely timely in her responses which is critical when we have a deadline mandated by the FDA. Many other attorneys cite the regulations which l've already read, but need further counsel. In my opinion, this demonstrates Shelly's in-depth knowledge of the regulations, how they pertain to the law, and how they are applicable IRL. Shelly's personable approach and pleasant manner in communication makes it very easy to have been work with her and have productive discussions on the best next steps. She truly has a passion iternational for all things FDA and I've learned so much from her.
Claire P. Client

News & Insights

Get the latest news on FDA regulatory delivered straight to your inbox.